(Topic: Zoo, weighted bear)
Prairie dogs. |
There was a “western” section, with store fronts – it seemed geared to school tours or something, and was kinda cheesy. |
While overall the park had a decent selection of animals that looked generally well kept, there were a few detractions:
1) because feeding was allowed and encouraged for all animals except a few dangerous ones, they don’t behave like the animals normally would and tended to crowd the fence and beg.
2) the layout was a little awkward, due to the hill in the middle of their land.
3) the signs were minimal and uninformative. Type of animal was basically all you could hope for, maybe the animal’s name. No further info.
4) the space was fairly restricted. It looks like they do conform to minimum space required per animal, but not necessarily much more than that.
Aspects they did well:
1) good variety of animals.
2) space seemed adequate per animal.
3) animals did not appear overweight or unhealthy, and signs did indicate a few times that there was a known issue and the vet was aware and involved.
4) small child play areas.
5) signs clearly indicated which animals could not be fed or needed caution.
I was personally disappointed that the tigers were out of sight, but that’s not their fault!
North American Porcupine, nibbling his lunch |
Pookie’s distant cousin! |
They had a section that was a bit more like a farm, with horses, ducks, chicken, sheep, cows and other bovine, and some were pettable. |
Pookie Train! |
Pookie riding the real train on Mama’s lap. Daddy took the picture. |
Lions and a tiger cage and a little blue bear, oh my! |
Yours,
Sarah
To subscribe, find the “subscribe by email” note in the left column and enter your email there. Posts will be emailed directly to you whenever I post them!
Resource list: Visit my spreadsheet at www.tinyurl.com/infantloss